I-90 tolling proposal: Your feedback helps shape alternatives and tolling options
Posted by Unknown in Bellevue, I-90, I-90 bridge, I-90 Tolling, I-90 tolling proposal, Mercer Island, Seattle, SR 520 - I-5 to Medina Bridge Replacement Project, sr 520 bridge, Tolling, tolling options on Friday, October 11, 2013
By guest blogger Emily Pace
I-90 Floating Bridge |
It’s important to remember why the Legislature asked us to study tolling I-90. The Cross-Lake Washington corridor – made up of the I-90 and SR 520 bridges – provides as a vital connection between our region’s major employment and population centers. We’re facing two key challenges with this corridor: funding the SR 520 - I-5 to Medina Bridge Replacement Project to complete the SR 520 Program and relieving congestion on I-90. To address these challenges, the Legislature asked us to evaluate tolling I-90 and complete an environmental impact statement to examine other possible project alternatives.
Many people suggested potential alternatives to tolling I-90 that may help meet the purpose of the project, which is to alleviate congestion on I-90 and fund SR 520 between I-5 and Medina. We used the suggestions to develop a list of potential solutions that fit into categories such as state or regional taxes, mileage fees, federal funding and adding new highway capacity.
Many suggestions came from folks who live or work on Mercer Island. When we discuss tolling I-90, we realize Mercer Island is in a very unique situation—fully reliant on I-90 to leave the Island in either direction. As we continue with the environmental process and evaluate the variable tolling alternative, we’re only considering potential tolling options (pdf 404 kb) that would offer Mercer Island a free or discounted way off the island.
More input needed Oct. 6 through Nov. 7 on proposal and alternatives
We’re having another 30-day comment period and we need your feedback again – this time on the potential alternatives and proposal to toll I-90. You can provide your comments online, by mail or in person at a public meeting in Bellevue, Mercer Island and Seattle. Last time, many folks wanted a chance to give verbal comment at the public meetings, so this time around we’re offering the chance to speak at each meeting.
What are the next steps?
Ultimately, the Legislature decides whether or not to toll I-90. After the comment period ends on Nov. 6, we will compile all the comments and summarize key themes into a summary report. Your feedback will help determine which alternatives are studied in the draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) analysis. In mid-2014, we will publish the DEIS findings and allow the public another opportunity to comment. We plan to deliver the final report to the Legislature in early 2015.
Have more questions?
Check out our common questions on I-90 tolling to find an answer.
This entry was posted on Friday, October 11, 2013 at 10:59 AM and is filed under Bellevue, I-90, I-90 bridge, I-90 Tolling, I-90 tolling proposal, Mercer Island, Seattle, SR 520 - I-5 to Medina Bridge Replacement Project, sr 520 bridge, Tolling, tolling options. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response.
- No comments yet.